The 'No' to the change of urban use of agricultural land sold by the State

In DDL established 'and' the possibility 'of change to 5 years of purchase

Do not like the measure for the stability of the bill, which provides for the sale of agricultural land of State and the possibility of changing the urban destination. The maxi-amendment, which in theory would help the public coffers, delivering revenue and raising the state agricultural use of some derelict land, in fact exposes the soil to the risk of speculation, the content contained in the transition from agricultural use to use for construction.

As stated in the measure, at 3 months after entry into force of the law, will be sold by private treaty all the land value of less than 400 thousand euros, and by public auction, those of higher value. 
 After 5 years of purchase, you can change the destination to urban land purchased.

More precisely, "in the event of increase in land value resulting from changes of alienated urban use occurred during the first years following the same alienation, the state has recognized a share of 75% of the highest value acquired from the soil than the price sales ". Devastation of the territory and reckless are the first images that come to mind. As the President of Coldiretti, Marini, the sale of agricultural land could encourage competition among companies and made in Italy, giving impetus to employment in the agricultural sector, but the change of use planning buries all the good intentions.

It should not neglect another aspect, which is that "assault savage" to a territory already weak, as evidenced by the recent flood events, as we see clearly Angelo Bonelli, National President of the Greens.